<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Which gives us another data point that
someone thought there was a use case sufficient enough to provide
a digital implementation.</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">A./<br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/1/2023 12:44 AM, Harriet Riddle
via Unicode wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:VI1PR07MB5712EDEDCF8F7A4657FC0E84B78C9@VI1PR07MB5712.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com">Indeed,
the only encoding I can think of right now (except PUA schemes)
which includes a turned asterism is the font-specific encoding for
the Bookshelf Symbol 7 font.
<br>
<br>
--Har.
<br>
<br>
Doug Ewell via Unicode wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">David Starner wrote:
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">There doesn't seem to be an inverted
asterism in Unicode. Is there a
<br>
good reason there's not?
<br>
</blockquote>
Probably the same reason as always: it wasn’t in a known
character set 30 years ago, and nobody has successfully proposed
it since then.
<br>
<br>
--
<br>
Doug Ewell, CC, ALB | Lakewood, CO, US | ewellic.org
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>