<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
Ken Whistler via Unicode <unicode@corp.unicode.org> hat am 28.03.2023 05:00 CEST geschrieben:
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
Whatever the use case might be for each of these, the quoted premise is simply incorrect.
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
<span style="font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace;">2071 ; Super # Lm SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER I<br>207F ; Super # Lm SUPERSCRIPT LATIN SMALL LETTER N<br>107A5 ; Super # Lm MODIFIER LETTER LATIN SMALL Q<br></span>
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">
That the names of 2071 and 207F depart from the usual pattern is simply an historical accident, based on the original sources for the encoding. These are them, they *are* encoded.
</div>
</blockquote>
<div>
Thank you for the clarification. So it was just me missing something, it is sometimes not easy to overview everything which is scattered to the four winds.
</div>
<div class="default-style">
And thanks to everyone for many interesting remarks.
</div>
<div class="default-style">
A. Stötzner
</div>
</body>
</html>