<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">That's the point.<br>
<br>
The data is accessible, but the tool is unable to use that
information. (Or "willingly" sets it aside because of the wording
of the request).<br>
<br>
Imagine, instead of a comment on a "water cooler conversation"
list like this, a hypothetical case of someone actually submitting
a full proposal for a script or an extension of one for which real
world data is hard to come by. With some generative algorithms
able to create images, you can make a proposal for a completely
fictitious script, with completely fictitious samples of supposed
text passages with nobody being the wiser.</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Of course, this could be done manually
as well, but the amount of effort required has been sufficient
deterrence. That equation has now shifted, and we need to figure
out whether our processes are up to this.</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Or imagine someone uses ChatGBT to
compose a proposal that, while it conforms to reality as far as
the characters are concerned, is full of statements on how the
script is supposedly written, its supposed origins, and supposed
application, that are not likewise based in actual expertise.<br>
<br>
With an automated tool, it takes no effort to create a very
plausible sounding document that is optimized towards approval,
while not restrained in any way by actual facts (or at least not
facts that are easily verifiable). We see this occasionally in
manually created documents that some submitters exaggerate the
spread of a script or the degree its in actual use, but this
process makes that so much easier.<br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">A./<br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/20/2023 11:28 AM, Gabriel Tellez
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CALpKH7ptzuN5_B+9mZtd=wJfauQW01tGZjj925w3SPyTAQED6A@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="auto">You think ChatGPT is smart enough to know it
already exits? </div>
<div><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 2:27
PM Doug Ewell <<a href="mailto:doug@ewellic.org"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">doug@ewellic.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204)">Gabriel
Tellez wrote:<br>
<br>
> Yall missing the joke. It was made by ChatGPT. It was
probably just<br>
> told to make a proposal.<br>
<br>
... for a character that already exists.<br>
<br>
Neither artificial nor natural intelligence was in play
here.<br>
<br>
--<br>
Doug Ewell, CC, ALB | Lakewood, CO, US | <a
href="http://ewellic.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">ewellic.org</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>