<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Actually not necessarily a bad idea, at least at first browsing,
but it's kind of out of scope for Unicode, isn't it? It sounds
like an update to ECMA-48 (which isn't part of Unicode), and
they're the people you'd have to convince.</p>
<p>~mark<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 1/4/23 19:53, Kent Karlsson via
Unicode wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:3ED0F608-F006-4835-A621-85053C4BBB50@bahnhof.se">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<span class="" lang="EN-GB"><o:p class=""></o:p></span></blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:3ED0F608-F006-4835-A621-85053C4BBB50@bahnhof.se">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 8pt; line-height:
15.546667098999023px; font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri,
sans-serif;"><span class="" lang="EN-GB">....<br>
It is, however, a while ago since the last update to ECMA-48,
and that shows. I’ve compiled a proposed update for the text
styling part of ECMA-48: </span><a
href="https://github.com/kent-karlsson/control/blob/main/ecma-48-style-modernisation-2022.pdf"
style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(5, 99, 193);"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext" moz-do-not-send="true">https://github.com/kent-karlsson/control/blob/main/ecma-48-style-modernisation-2022.pdf</a></p>
....<br>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>