<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 7/13/2022 2:58 AM, r12a wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:84c1ae3b-c142-dfcf-6a61-4321d32e8b2c@w3.org">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div style="font-family: Raleway;">The approach differs not only
        by script and which digits are used, but also by language. 
        Arabic and Persian both use the Arabic script, but do things
        differently when it comes to ordering components of a range or
        expression.<br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p>Isn't that difference handled by having two different sets of
      digits? As opposed to relying on a language tag.<br>
    </p>
    <p>A./<br>
    </p>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:84c1ae3b-c142-dfcf-6a61-4321d32e8b2c@w3.org">
      <div style="font-family: Raleway;"><br>
        Also, we should probably mention that some scripts don't display
        simple numbers like Arabic/Hebrew, either. For example, in Adlam
        & N'Ko and various historical scripts numbers have the
        most-significant digit on the right.<br>
        <br>
        ri<br>
        <br>
        <span>Asmus Freytag via Unicode wrote on 13/07/2022 02:49:</span><br>
        <blockquote type="cite"
          cite="mid:79c1ed70-ac31-33c2-e8d3-a7212645e44a@ix.netcom.com">
          <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
            charset=UTF-8">
          <p><font face="Candara">I suggest we add something like the
              following to the Bidi FAQ:</font></p>
          <p><font face="Candara">Q: Do modern bidirectional scripts all
              behave the same?<br>
              <br>
              While Arabic and Hebrew agree on the same ordering of
              digits, with the most-significant digit on the left, the
              layout of entire numbers in context, including groups of
              numbers or use of number separators, numerical and other
              punctuation differs both by script and, in the case of
              Arabic, by which set of digits is used. No matter how the
              layout is resolved the order of characters in
              memory essentially follows the order they are typed. <br>
              <br>
              Here are some papers that explore this in-depth with
              examples: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                href="https://r12a.github.io/scripts/arabic/arb.html#expressions"
                moz-do-not-send="true">https://r12a.github.io/scripts/arabic/arb.html#expressions</a>
              <br>
              <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                href="https://r12a.github.io/scripts/arabic/block.html#ar061C"
                moz-do-not-send="true">https://r12a.github.io/scripts/arabic/block.html#ar061C</a></font><br>
          </p>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p><br>
    </p>
  </body>
</html>