<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 4/1/22 13:21, Markus Scherer via
Unicode wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAN49p6pP2XVyVPHbra6M2cE6E1KpnZFZiK+oznTT_RedBFP=Ug@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 9:54 AM Mark E. Shoulson
via Unicode <<a href="mailto:unicode@corp.unicode.org"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">unicode@corp.unicode.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">So, wouldn't it be a good
idea to set Numeric_Value fields for all these <br>
well-known numbers?<br>
<br>
(Answer: No. No, it would not be a good idea. See the
date.)<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thank you! You had me revved up there for a moment :-)</div>
<div>markus</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Heh! Glad it was appreciated! Of course, not sure people
telling me "you had me going there" says about me, that people
could think I was serious about that. Either that or it isn't
quite *that* ridiculous of an idea. (Actually, the latter is
probably true. There's a lot of space in ridiculousness; an idea
can easily be "not *that* ridiculous" and still be very bad.)</p>
<p>~mark<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>