<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/9/21 18:33, Asmus Freytag via
Unicode wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:f284be2f-008e-e174-fdd8-44dcb66edb7c@ix.netcom.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/9/2021 3:20 PM, James Kass via
Unicode wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:865d5e90-5fc6-b7a0-6e11-fde03fa7f494@code2001.com"> <br>
To clarify my original post, I'd failed to consider natural
language neographies until Anshuman Pandey's reply. My comments
about PUA usage should only be applied to neographies for which
no defined user community exists. Widespread PUA usage should
not be required as a metric for natural language neographies. <br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<p><font face="Candara">Which means some other metric might need
to be applied, like institutional support or
anticipated/promised official stature.</font></p>
</blockquote>
<p><font face="Candara">Or just generally non-computer usage. Some
of these proposals haven't been encoded even in PUA, but we are
told about classes being taught in them (and people actually
attending those classes!) and periodicals published (and people
reading them!) and so on. PUA usage isn't the only way to
demonstrate usage. Ink and paper work too.</font></p>
<p><font face="Candara">~mark<br>
</font></p>
</body>
</html>