<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Do you discern a lack of robustness in the recent proposal
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2020/20181-klingon.pdf">https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2020/20181-klingon.pdf</a>, given the
evidence included by reference from
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2016/16329-piqad-returns.pdf">https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2016/16329-piqad-returns.pdf</a>? Apart
from not answering the IP question, which is admittedly something
I have no news on. Obviously more evidence is always welcome, but
is there at least something approaching more convincing evidence
in the links above? Book covers at
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.amazon.com.au/s?i=books-single-index&rh=p_27%3ADeSDu%27&s=relevancerank&text=DeSDu%27&ref=dp_byline_sr_book_1">https://www.amazon.com.au/s?i=books-single-index&rh=p_27%3ADeSDu%27&s=relevancerank&text=DeSDu%27&ref=dp_byline_sr_book_1</a>
? (yes, I realize that is a single author and doesn't prove much,
and I don't have a link to a book that I'm sure has pIqaD on the
inside ready to hand.)</p>
<p>~mark<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/15/21 2:54 AM, Asmus Freytag via
Unicode wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:9edd1f9b-e5af-49d3-3f9d-97a4e9007fec@ix.netcom.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/14/2021 11:19 PM, James Kass via
Unicode wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:70401214-6b6a-9ceb-5006-5d5bf3a1f075@code2001.com">Getting
back to the subject thread, if Tengwar had been on the "Not the
Roadmap" page and a more robust proposal had been submitted
(along with the passage of time and a shifting of attitudes),
would it be necessary for the proposer to make a separate
request for Tengwar to be removed from the "Not..." page -- or
would the Consortium remove it from that page as a matter of
course upon considering the newer proposal? <br>
</blockquote>
<p><font face="Candara">The key words here are "robust proposal".</font></p>
<p><font face="Candara">A robust proposal with strong new evidence
and good and complete answers to earlier objections is the key
thing to overcoming any hurdles to acceptance, procedural or
otherwise.</font></p>
<p><font face="Candara">A./</font><br>
</p>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>