Question Regarding UCD Draft Files and GraphemeBreakTest Discrepancy

[Naoto Sato]

Thanks, Peter, Robin. Looking forward to the fix in the beta.

Naoto

On 3/22/25 9:22 AM, Robin Leroy wrote:
> Peter has aptly summarized the history of the Extended_Pictographic 
> changes in 17.0, and indeed U+2701 does not have the 
> Extended_Pictographic property in 17.0α draft data.
> 
> Le sam. 22 mars 2025 à 05:26, Peter Constable via Unicode 
> <unicode at corp.unicode.org <mailto:unicode at corp.unicode.org>> a écrit :
> 
>     It's possible that some test data that should have had a
>     corresponding update was overlooked.
> 
> That is not merely possible, it is true. Naoto is correct 17.0α draft 
> data has incorrect test cases. I have identified the bug in the code 
> that generates the test cases, and I will deal with it next week.
> 
> While that is indeed the preferred way to report issues, there is need 
> to file PRI feedback on this specific issue, it will be dealt with. I 
> will of course ensure that Naoto is mentioned in the 17.0 acknowledgements.
> Best regards,
> 
> Robin Leroy