Odp: RE: Re: Re: Unicode fundamental character identity

[James Kass]

On 2025-01-31 5:42 PM, piotrunio-2004 at wp.pl via Unicode wrote:
> I'm not saying that it is, but if I'm relying on arguments relevant to 
> the actual usage of the characters, and the dominant opposing side 
> does not provide all that much coherent of a reasoning in return, then 
> I'm getting suspicious.

Doug and Peter have provided some good advice with respect to such 
suspicions.  My apologies to Peter Constable for my failure to 
understand exactly what was being dismissed earlier in this thread.

Quoting from https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2025/25010-script-wg-report.pdf

"We deem the differences demonstrated in the proposal to not constitute 
differences in plain text. No evidence of a document that would make a 
distinction between the corresponding characters in the different code 
pages was provided."

That seems coherent enough.  If a simple and concise exhibit can be made 
showing the desired distinction making a difference in plain text, then 
that would be a logical next step.  Evidence illustrating data loss in 
round-tripping would also be helpful.  Input from the user community 
supporting retaining distinctions in Unicode should help the effort.