Use of tag characters in a private encoding - is it valid please?

[William_J_G Overington]

In the post
 
 
https://corp.unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/2024-May/010886.html 
<https://corp.unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/2024-May/010886.html>
 
 
James Kass wrote as follows.
 
 
> COMET plus CIRCUMFLEX ...
 
 
For the benefit of newer readers of this mailing list, I mention that 
this is a reference to the following.
 
 
http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~ngo/c_c00000.htm 
<http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~ngo/c_c00000.htm>
 
 
There is a short thread about this in the archive of this mailing list 
for October 2002. However, most of the disscussion about it is in a 
thread with the title Keys that is in the archive for September 2002.
 
 
There is also a mention in the following document.
 
 
https://www.unicode.org/review/pri408/ 
<https://www.unicode.org/review/pri408/>
 
 
I have not researched on the Comet Circumflex system since. My present 
research is on a  structurally simpler system with no parameters in the 
sentences. Since that time I have learned how to make fonts (at a 
hobbyist level, not at expert level) and I have been able to design 
symbols and make and apply a font that includes those symbols.
 
 
William Overington
 
 
Tuesday 7 May 2024
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://corp.unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/attachments/20240507/0deb0d7b/attachment-0001.htm>