does anybody know about these accidentals?

Hans Åberg haberg-1 at telia.com
Fri Jul 26 03:12:47 CDT 2024


> On 26 Jul 2024, at 09:54, Jim DeLaHunt <list+unicode at jdlh.com> wrote:
> 
> On 2024-07-25 18:15, Jim DeLaHunt wrote:
>> …So it sounds like this is a "history of music notation" question, rather than a character encoding question.… 
>> …Who wants to hear the reply?  If it is @gro-tsen.bsky.social, and if the person who knows the answer is not on BlueSky, to whom do they reply? …
>> [What is] the question to be passed on to the W3C Music Notation Community Group and the MEI group?…
> 
> On 2024-07-26 00:09, Hans Åberg via Unicode wrote:
>> …it has been discussed here whether to add the rest of the Smufl characters.…
> On 2024-07-26 00:17, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>> …Given that there is a new proposal to add more microtonal accidentals
>> to Unicode, the main question is whether there should be a single
>> character code for 'an accidental that raises a sharp by a quarter
>> tone' (and analogous cases) or not.…
> 
> 
> On 2024-07-26 00:43, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>> …the shown glyph shape is disputable – or not, depending on
>> the point of view. After some thinking I now believe that they
>> shouldn't be changed. However, the description should be improved.…
> I am now confused. This thread opened by asking who knew about two music notation symbols. I pointed out two internet communities which might have people who know about music notation. Because I am subscribed to both, I offered to pass on the question as I understood it.  I now no longer understand what question to pass on.

It would be helpful if you ask about adding the Smufl characters to Unicode, and how they think the issue with duplicates should be resolved.

The questions about the original characters in this thread lead to the principles used when making additions to Unicode, but since they have already been added, and not used so much, not so important in themselves.

> I will leave it to the proponents of these proposal(s) to contact those communities if they think it will be helpful. 
> Best regards,
>     —Jim DeLaHunt
> -- 
> . --Jim DeLaHunt, jdlh at jdlh.com http://blog.jdlh.com/ (http://jdlh.com/)
> multilingual websites consultant, Vancouver, B.C., Canada




More information about the Unicode mailing list