Two questions here. Is the Pridnestrovian Ruble not used enough to be added to Unicode, and did I mess up by sending my proposal thrice?

[Markus Scherer]

On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 8:18 AM kxeo via Unicode <unicode at corp.unicode.org>
wrote:

> They haven't responded in two weeks. Patience may be key but something
> tells me that they aren't getting back. Did the triple email make them
> no longer respond? Maybe it was the double email, or maybe they're just
> drowning in emails?
>

Unicode does not work that fast, and shouldn't, because once a character is
encoded, it is permanent, and adds to what everyone has to implement.

If you look in the document register https://www.unicode.org/L2/L-curdoc.htm
--
you will see document L2/24-134 “Proposal to Encode a Pridnestrovian Ruble
Sign”

There is also document L2/24-166 “Recommendations to UTC #180 July 2024 on
Script Proposals” which briefly discusses this proposal, points to an
earlier proposal, and makes some suggestions.
The Script Encoding Working Group will present L2/24-166 in the quarterly
UTC meeting this week.

Best regards,
markus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://corp.unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/attachments/20240723/9d4450e8/attachment.htm>