Why is (vv) -> (w) not amongst the Confusables? [SEC=OFFICIAL]

[Doug Ewell]

Richard Wordingham wrote:

> On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 02:57:37 +0000
> "Richter, Andrew MR via Unicode" <unicode at corp.unicode.org> wrote:
>
>> IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of
>> Defence. Unauthorised communication and dealing with the information
>> in the email may be a serious criminal offence.
>> If you have received this email in error, you are requested to
>> contact the sender and delete the email immediately.
>
> You should really prefix this warning with a statement that the
> communication is strictly limited to all entities within 100 light
> years of Earth.

Indeed, I had already deleted the original message, and would not have responded to the underlying question about Unicode even if I had the answer.

Broad legal threats from military agencies are not to be dismissed lightly.

--
Doug Ewell, CC, ALB | Lakewood, CO, US | ewellic.org