Missing "(Heavy)EQUAL SIGN-Emoji"

[Asmus Freytag]

On 3/19/2023 4:01 PM, Sławomir Osipiuk via Unicode wrote:
> Quite a lot, actually, but at its heart it's still a computer and 
> hence more likely to do what you tell it than what you want.
> I assume "LX" told ChatGPT to "write a proposal for a Heavy Equals 
> Sign Emoji" rather than asking "Is there a Heavy Equals Sign Emoji 
> defined in Unicode?"

Right, and I had asked you do to it, you would have noticed it's there 
already and asked me why I was so daft to propose something as missing 
that is already present. Also, if you had concluded that a new character 
would be required, you would have argued why the seemingly existing one 
was not in fact the one that you thought is needed. That being a a 
requirement of a good proposal (explaining why seeming alternatives are 
not valid).

So, if the role of the chatbot just consists of creating plausible 
sounding language, we should ban their use in submissions and 
communications with the Consortium. Because they may make it sound like 
a proposal or suggestion is well researched or thought out, when if fact 
it isn't, wasting everybody's time.

A./

>
> On Sunday, 19 March 2023, 17:58:04 (-04:00), Asmus Freytag via Unicode 
> wrote:
>
>     Well, what can you expect from a message written by a chatbot?
>
>     A./
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://corp.unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/attachments/20230319/f3b7a6b6/attachment.htm>