Unicode 15.1 repertoire

[James Kass]

Hi Markus,

Thank you for the updated information.

It's too bad that the "GIDC23" numbers were revised because renumbering 
from the repertoire presented during the beta review period would have 
been simpler.  Although the metadata.txt file (found in the links you 
sent) has a cross-reference to an apparently earlier Unicode proposal, 
it is not the same repertoire as the beta review charts and data.

Best regards,

James

On 2023-08-23 1:16 AM, Markus Scherer via Unicode wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> Extension I was expanded from 603 characters to 622 as a result of 
> decisions in UTC #176 <https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2023/23157.htm> 
> based on
> https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2023/23114r-unc-extension-i.pdf
> https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2023/23163-cjk-unihan-group-utc176.pdf
>
> Best regards,
> markus