Tengwar on a general purpose translation site
William_J_G Overington
wjgo_10009 at btinternet.com
Wed Mar 9 13:40:10 CST 2022
James Kass wrote:
> If no, then it may be pointless to pursue standardization of fictional
> ConScripts.
I opine that it needs to be remembered that some authors of a novel that
uses a conscript that the author has devised may be delighted for the
conscript to become encoded in regular Unicode and regard it as a great
honour and great recognition of the author's work, which indeed I opine
that it would be.
> If yes, ..., telling the IP holder that the writing system in question
> will likely be encoded one way or another.
I opine that that would not be a diplomatic, kind, or fair way to "tell"
someone something.
If permission were given for Tengwar to become encoded into regular
Unicode, I opine that that would be a great way to celebrate the work
and art of J. R. R. Tolkien for as long as Unicode and ISO/IEC 10646
exist.
What if the Tolkien Estate were offered the inclusion of a piece of text
of a significant length together with illustrations about Tengwar and
the work of J. R. R. Tolkien in The Unicode Standard, in a chapter of
its own?
William Overington
Wednesday 9 March 2022
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://corp.unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/attachments/20220309/070ebd7e/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Unicode
mailing list