bold, italic, underline at once

[Doug Ewell]

I was simply trying to find out what direction the OP was headed (ECMA-48 vs. something else), not focusing on the precise terminology or arcane details like GRCM.

Based on the OP's post from August 14, I was guessing he was headed in the direction of "let's encode some new stuff in Unicode to support this," but I wanted to find out.

--
Doug Ewell, CC, ALB | Lakewood, CO, US | ewellic.org


> Nit: it is actually ANSI X3.64; but the best way to refer to it (international, original, easy to remember) is ECMA-48.
> ...