QID emoji (from Re: The encoding of flags)
James Kass
jameskass at code2001.com
Thu Oct 7 15:16:32 CDT 2021
On 2021-10-07 9:48 AM, William_J_G Overington via Unicode wrote:
>
> James Kass wrote:
>
>> QID Emoji fonts are possible with existing technology ...
>
> Yes.
>
>> ... and don't require any action/approval by Unicode.
>
> Well, is that correct? ...
Unicode hasn't approved QID Emoji and approval appears unlikely, yet it
works!
With limited exceptions, Unicode doesn't standardize strings. Unicode
only standardizes the characters of which those strings are composed.
Anybody can use any Unicode string as a pointer into anyone's database
without seeking Unicode's permission.
What this means is that a vendor like Apple or Google could set up to
provide users with a plethora of new emoji glyphs/images using the
blueprint offered in the QID Emoji proposal. And Unicode wouldn't need
to take any action or make any approval of it. And if the major vendors
lacked interest, third-partiers could step up to the plate. If there
was sufficient user demand for it.
More information about the Unicode
mailing list