Tai Laing Sibilants

Richard Wordingham richard.wordingham at ntlworld.com
Mon Aug 30 18:01:36 CDT 2021


On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 19:41:04 +0000
Michel Suignard via Unicode <unicode at corp.unicode.org> wrote:

> It is however in the WG2 side as
> https://www.unicode.org/wg2/docs/n3976.pdf Quite a few of those cases
> out there (where L2 and WG2 are not in sync in their revision
> history), same date but quite different. I think L2 should add this
> one for reference. Michel

Thanks for the clarification.  Unfortunately, the resolution is rather confusing.

At L2, we have L2/12-012, labelled in the top right-hand corner as
replacing L2/11-130, and dated 23 May 2011 and at the first line of the
top right-hand corner labelled as ISO/IEC JTC1/SC2/WG2 N3976.

Meanwhile, at WG2, the file https://www.unicode.org/wg2/docs/n3976.pdf
bears in the top right-hand corner the reference numbers ISO/IEC
JTC1/SC2/WG2 N3976R and L2/11-130R and the date 19 April 2011.
However, in the title block, it bears two dates, 23 May 2011 and 11
February 2012.

It looks as though the sequence is:

Latest date  WG2 number   L2 number    Held in

2011-04-19     -          L2/11-130    L2

2011-05-23   N3976        L2/12-012    L2

2012-02-11   N3976R       L2/11-130R   WG2

L2/11-130R seems to differ from L2/12-012 by the addition of a section
about confusables on p9.  There might be other changes that I didn't
spot in a quick visual scan.  They seem to have the same repertoire of
additional points.

Richard.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Unicode <unicode-bounces at corp.unicode.org> On Behalf Of Ken
> Whistler via Unicode Sent: Monday, August 30, 2021 9:49 AM
> To: Richard Wordingham <richard.wordingham at ntlworld.com>
> Cc: unicode at corp.unicode.org
> Subject: Re: Tai Laing Sibilants
> 
> Richard,
> 
> On 8/30/2021 9:17 AM, Richard Wordingham via Unicode wrote:
> > That references L2/11-130R, which I can't find.  The document
> > register only knows L2/11-130 dated 19 April 2011.  I wonder if it
> > was lost in the great crash.  
> 
> No. The document register from 2011 (and all the other document
> registers prior to 2020) was unaffected by the VM crash of April
> 2020. There never was a L2/11-130R filed in the document register.
> 
> --ken
> 
> 



More information about the Unicode mailing list