junicode at jcbradfield.org
Sun Aug 1 08:53:29 CDT 2021
On 2021-08-01, David Chmelik via Unicode <unicode at corp.unicode.org> wrote:
> less-common cases there is notation for that. In the more common cases
> of just one level, scientists are tired of having to use other notation.
Do you have evidence for that? I've never interacted with a scientist
who would rather remember how to type a superscript unicode character
than type ^.
More information about the Unicode