Draft proposal: Clarify guidance for use of a BOM as a UTF-8 encoding signature
tom at honermann.net
Tue Oct 13 12:45:48 CDT 2020
On 10/13/20 4:57 AM, Hans Åberg wrote:
> It would be best if stated that its use is a type of metadata, and such, Unicode has no opinion on its use.
I'm interpreting that as an endorsement for the first suggested
resolution in the paper.
>> On 10 Oct 2020, at 20:54, Tom Honermann via Unicode <unicode at unicode.org> wrote:
>> Attached is a draft proposal for the Unicode standard that intends to clarify the current recommendation regarding use of a BOM in UTF-8 text. This is follow up to discussion on the Unicode mailing list back in June.
>> Feedback is welcome. I plan to submit this to the UTC in a week or so pending review feedback.
More information about the Unicode