OverStrike control character
Richard Wordingham
richard.wordingham at ntlworld.com
Sat Jun 20 06:24:52 CDT 2020
On Sat, 20 Jun 2020 04:48:00 +0000
James Kass via Unicode <unicode at unicode.org> wrote:
> Richard Wordingham wrote,
>> The proper mechanism would be to use a PUA character.
>
> This would only be true if the data wasn’t intended to be
> interchangeable.
PUA-encoded material is interchangeable - you just need to agree to the
convention. Emoji started out in the PUA. Remember the Conscript
Registry?
Richard.
More information about the Unicode
mailing list