OverStrike control character

Richard Wordingham richard.wordingham at ntlworld.com
Sat Jun 20 06:24:52 CDT 2020

On Sat, 20 Jun 2020 04:48:00 +0000
James Kass via Unicode <unicode at unicode.org> wrote:

> Richard Wordingham wrote,

>> The proper mechanism would be to use a PUA character.  
> This would only be true if the data wasn’t intended to be
> interchangeable.

PUA-encoded material is interchangeable - you just need to agree to the
convention.  Emoji started out in the PUA.  Remember the Conscript


More information about the Unicode mailing list