Alternate presentation for U+229C CIRCLED EQUALS?

[Mark E. Shoulson]

On 6/5/20 6:48 PM, abrahamgross--- via Unicode wrote:
> Yes, thank you!
>
> I vote for a separate codepoint for the CIRCLED EQUALS SIGN since it 
> has a different meaning and would also visually be displayed differently
>
> 2020/06/05 午後6:27:43 Asmus Freytag via Unicode <unicode at unicode.org>:
>
>     Overloading this mathematical symbol with anything that needs
>     different styling is *wrong*.
>
We don't get to "vote" here, but I think my preference, too, would be to 
encode a new character, as opposed to a variant of U+229C (or doing 
nothing, which of course is another alternative.)  The "ND" license 
symbol just seems to be a different creature to the math operator.

~mark

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://corp.unicode.org/mailman/private/unicode/attachments/20200605/e5323b7d/attachment.htm>