Unicode "no-op" Character?

Sławomir Osipiuk via Unicode unicode at unicode.org
Sun Jun 23 19:30:37 CDT 2019

Ah, sorry. I meant to say that the string should always be normalized (not "sanitized") before being checked for exploits (i.e. sanitized).

-----Original Message-----
From: Sławomir Osipiuk [mailto:sosipiuk at gmail.com] 
Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2019 20:28
To: unicode at unicode.org
Cc: 'Richard Wordingham'
Subject: RE: Unicode "no-op" Character?

The string should always be sanitized before being checked for exploits

More information about the Unicode mailing list