Unicode "no-op" Character?
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
unicode at unicode.org
Sun Jun 23 03:37:04 CDT 2019
On Sat, 22 Jun 2019 21:10:08 -0400
Sławomir Osipiuk via Unicode <unicode at unicode.org> wrote:
> In fact, that might be the best description: It's not just an
> "ignorable", it's a "discardable". Unicode doesn't have that, does it?
No, though the byte order mark at the start of a file comes close.
Discardables are a security risk, as security filters may find it hard
to take them into account.
More information about the Unicode