Numeric group separators and Bidi

Egmont Koblinger via Unicode unicode at unicode.org
Tue Jul 9 16:09:56 CDT 2019


On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 10:43 PM Philippe Verdy <verdy_p at wanadoo.fr> wrote:
>
> Well my first feeling was that U+202F should work all the time, but I found cases where this is not always the case. So this must be bugs in those renderers.

Could you share some concrete examples?


More information about the Unicode mailing list