A last missing link for interoperable representation
James Kass via Unicode
unicode at unicode.org
Sat Jan 12 20:17:34 CST 2019
On 2019-01-12 4:26 PM, wjgo_10009 at btinternet.com wrote:
> I have now made, tested and published a font, VS14 Maquette, that uses
> VS14 to indicate italic.
The italics don't happen in Notepad, but VS14 Maquette works spendidly
in LibreOffice! (Windows 7) (In a *.TXT file)
Since the VS characters are supposed to be used with officially
registered/recognized sequences, it's possible that Notepad isn't trying
to implement the feature.
The official reception of the notion of using variant letter forms, such
as italics, in plain-text is typically frosty. So advancement of
plain-text might be left up to third-party developers, enthusiasts, and
the actual text users. And there's nothing wrong with that. (It's
non-conformant, though, unless the VS material is officially
Non-Latin scripts, such as Khmer, may have their own traditions and
conventions WRT special letter forms. Which is why starting at VS14 and
working backwards might be inadequate in the long run.
Khmer has letter forms called muul/moul/muol (not sure how to spell that
one, but neither is anybody else). It superficially resembles fraktur
for Khmer. Other non-Latin scripts may have a plethora of such
More information about the Unicode