A last missing link for interoperable representation

[James Kass via Unicode]

Asmus Freytag wrote,

 > ...
 > (for an extreme example there's an orthography
 > out there that uses @ as a letter -- we know that
 > won't work well with email addresses and duplicate
 > encoding of the @ shape is a complete non-starter).

Everything's a non-starter.  Until it begins.

Is this a casing orthography?  (Please see attached image.)

We've seen where typewriter kludges enabled users to represent the 
glottal stop with a question mark (or a digit seven).  Unicode makes 
those kludges unnecessary.

But we're still using typewriter kludges to represent stress in Latin 
script because there is no Unicode plain text solution.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: NaturalCase.png
Type: image/png
Size: 3325 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/attachments/20190108/6ab937cd/attachment.png>