Richard Wordingham via Unicode
unicode at unicode.org
Sat Feb 9 08:21:24 CST 2019
On Sat, 9 Feb 2019 04:52:30 -0800
David Starner via Unicode <unicode at unicode.org> wrote:
> Note that this is actually the only thing that stands out to me in
> Unicode not supporting older character sets; in PETSCII (Commodore
> 64), the high-bit character characters were the reverse (in this
> sense) of the low-bit characters.
Later ISCII has some styling codes, bold and italic amongst them.
More information about the Unicode