Base64 encoding applied to different unicode texts always yields different base64 texts ... true or false?

[Steffen Nurpmeso via Unicode]

Doug Ewell via Unicode wrote in <2A67B4F082F74F8AADF34BA11D885554 at DougEwell>:
 |Steffen Nurpmeso wrote:
 |> Base64 is defined in RFC 2045 (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions
 |> (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message Bodies).
 |
 |Base64 is defined in RFC 4648, "The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data
 |Encodings." RFC 2045 defines a particular implementation of base64,
 |specific to transporting Internet mail in a 7-bit environment.
 |
 |RFC 4648 discusses many of the "higher-level protocol" topics that some
 |people are focusing on, such as separating the base64-encoded output
 |into lines of length 72 (or other), alternative target code unit sets or
 |"alphabets," and padding characters. It would be helpful for everyone to
 |read this particular RFC before concluding that these topics have not
 |been considered, or that they compromise round-tripping or other
 |characteristics of base64.
 |
 |I had assumed that when Roger asked about "base64 encoding," he was
 |asking about the basic definition of base64.

Sure; i have only followed the discussion superficially, and even
though everybody can read RFCs, i felt the necessity to polemicize
against the false however i look at it "MIME actually splits
a binary object into multiple fragments at random positions".
Solely my fault.

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,                The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter           he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)