Why is TAMIL SIGN VIRAMA (pulli) not Alphabetic?
Richard Wordingham via Unicode
unicode at unicode.org
Tue May 29 16:49:06 CDT 2018
On Tue, 29 May 2018 14:03:25 -0700
Doug Ewell via Unicode <unicode at unicode.org> wrote:
> In any case, Ken has answered the real underlying question: a process
> that checks whether each character in a sequence is "alphabetic" is
> inappropriate for determining whether the sequence constitutes a word.
Back in the second post of the thread, I made the point that a
conformant Unicode process cannot always give a yes/no answer to the
question of whether all characters in a string are alphabetic.
What we seem to have established is that Unicode properties are not set
up to facilitate the identification of words. Given that
spell-checkers work, we have taken a wrong turn. Perhaps we should
reconsider "b⃝e⃝", which consists of two letters each inside its own
enclosing circle. The spell-checker I'm using considers it a
misspelt word, rather than two symbols side by side.
More information about the Unicode