implicit weight base for U+2CEA2

[Markus Scherer via Unicode]

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:49 PM, James Tauber via Unicode <
unicode at unicode.org> wrote:

> I recently updated pyuca[1], my pure Python implementation of the Unicode
> Collation Algorithm to work with 8.0.0, 9.0.0, and 10.0.0 but to get all
> the tests to work, I had to special case the implicit weight base for
> U+2CEA2. The spec seems to suggest the base should be FB80 but I had to
> override just that code point to have a base of FBC0 for the tests to pass.
>
> Is this a known issue with the spec or something I've missed?
>

2CEA2..2CEAF are unassigned code points for which the UCA+DUCET uses a base
of FBC0.

markus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/attachments/20170927/5da2ad27/attachment.html>