Emoji anomaly

Peter Edberg via Unicode unicode at unicode.org
Sun Oct 29 12:12:44 CDT 2017


Hi André,

> U+1F321 ➜ U+1F32C do not have Emoji_Presentation property set. Time for me to do some reading to determine why.


From https://www.unicode.org/emoji/charts-5.0/emoji-versions-sources.html <https://www.unicode.org/emoji/charts-5.0/emoji-versions-sources.html>
you can see that these characters came into Unicode as a result of their being in the Webdings/Wingdings set, where they had a prior history of being non-emoji text characters. That is why they have Emoji_Presentation=No by default.

- Peter E


> On Oct 29, 2017, at 6:47 AM, Andre Schappo via Unicode <unicode at unicode.org> wrote:
> 
> Peter
> 
> Thank you very much for your informative response. I see that U+1F321 ➜ U+1F32C do not have Emoji_Presentation property set. Time for me to do some reading to determine why.
> 
> André
> 
>> On 29 Oct 2017, at 00:20, Peter Edberg <pedberg at unicode.org <mailto:pedberg at unicode.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> This is about characters U+1F327,U+1F326
>> 
>> The variation selector FE0F is *not* unnecessary in with these. Looking at
>> https://www.unicode.org/Public/emoji/5.0/emoji-data.txt <https://www.unicode.org/Public/emoji/5.0/emoji-data.txt>
>> those characters do *not* have the Emoji-Presentation property set, and they do have variation sequences defined.
>> 
>> From https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr51/#Emoji_Variation_Selector_Notes <https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr51/#Emoji_Variation_Selector_Notes>, such singleton emoji characters
>> “should have emoji presentation selectors on base characters with Emoji_Presentation=No whenever an emoji presentation is desired”
>> 
>> - Peter E
>> 
>>> On Oct 28, 2017, at 4:11 AM, Andre Schappo via Unicode <unicode at unicode.org <mailto:unicode at unicode.org>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I am working on a Blog Article ( https://schappo.blogspot.co.uk/2017/10/computer-science-internationalization.html <https://schappo.blogspot.co.uk/2017/10/computer-science-internationalization.html> ) and do not currently have access to OSX High Sierra, I am using OSX Sierra. I would appreciate some help from someone using OSX High Sierra.
>>> 
>>> Using Sierra's Chinese Simplified Input Method the Emoji ��️ and ��️ have an unnecessary U+FE0F variation selector appended. The other Emoji I have tested with Sierra's Chinese Simplified Input Method do not have the variation selector appended. Could someone please check if the same happens with High Sierra
>>> 
>>> Thank you
>>> 
>>> André
>>> �� �� ��
>>> André Schappo
>>> https://schappo.blogspot.co.uk <https://schappo.blogspot.co.uk/>
>>> https://twitter.com/andreschappo <https://twitter.com/andreschappo>
>>> https://weibo.com/andreschappo <https://weibo.com/andreschappo>
>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/computer-science-curriculum-internationalization <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/computer-science-curriculum-internationalization>
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/attachments/20171029/6238c0fd/attachment.html>


More information about the Unicode mailing list