Feedback on the proposal to change U+FFFD generation when decoding ill-formed UTF-8

Doug Ewell via Unicode unicode at unicode.org
Tue May 23 15:42:58 CDT 2017


Asmus Freytag \(c\) wrote:

> And why add a recommendation that changes that from completely up to
> the implementation (or groups of implementations) to something where
> one way of doing it now has to justify itself?

A recommendation already exists, at the end of Section 3.9. The current
proposal is to change it to recommend something else. 
 
--
Doug Ewell | Thornton, CO, US | ewellic.org



More information about the Unicode mailing list