Standaridized variation sequences for the Desert alphabet?
Martin J. Dürst
duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp
Tue Mar 28 06:38:22 CDT 2017
On 2017/03/28 01:20, Michael Everson wrote:
> Ken transcribes into modern type a letter by Shelton dated 1859, in which “boy” is written <>, “few” as <>, “truefully” [sic] as <>, and “you” as <>.
These are all 1859 variants, yes? That would just show that these
variants existed (which I think nobody in this discussion has doubted),
but not that there was contrasting use. And is that letter hand-written
More information about the Unicode