Standaridized variation sequences for the Desert alphabet?

[Michael Everson]

On 26 Mar 2017, at 18:20, Doug Ewell <doug at ewellic.org> wrote:
> 
> Michael Everson wrote:
> 
>> One practical consequence of changing the chart glyphs now, for instance, would be that it would invalidate every existing Deseret font. Adding new characters would not.
> 
> I thought the chart glyphs were not normative.

Come on, Doug. The letter W is a ligature of V and V. But sure, the glyphs are only informative, so why don’t we use an OO ligature instead?

Michael.