Standaridized variation sequences for the Desert alphabet?

Michael Everson everson at
Sun Mar 26 12:33:00 CDT 2017

On 26 Mar 2017, at 18:20, Doug Ewell <doug at> wrote:
> Michael Everson wrote:
>> One practical consequence of changing the chart glyphs now, for instance, would be that it would invalidate every existing Deseret font. Adding new characters would not.
> I thought the chart glyphs were not normative.

Come on, Doug. The letter W is a ligature of V and V. But sure, the glyphs are only informative, so why don’t we use an OO ligature instead?


More information about the Unicode mailing list