Standaridized variation sequences for the Desert alphabet?

Michael Everson everson at
Sun Mar 26 11:20:42 CDT 2017

> On 26 Mar 2017, at 16:59, Asmus Freytag <asmusf at> wrote:
> On 3/26/2017 8:47 AM, Michael Everson wrote:
>>> On 26 Mar 2017, at 16:45, Asmus Freytag <asmusf at> wrote:
>>> The latter is patent nonsense, because ä and aͤ are even less related to each other than "i" and "j"; never mind the fact that their forms are both based on the letter "a". Encoding and font choice should be seen as separate.
>> He refers to the shape of the diacritical marks.
> I see the issue: the font selected on my end made the "e" look like an "o", which completely changed my understanding of what he tried to communicate.

Ah, yes.


More information about the Unicode mailing list