RFCs go Unicode

[Mark Davis ☕️]

That's great news. It will be so much clearer to be able to have examples
with the real characters in them, and to be able to acknowledge the work of
authors with the real forms of their names.

Mark

On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 4:48 AM, Andre Schappo <A.Schappo at lboro.ac.uk> wrote:

> RFC 7997: The Use of Non-ASCII Characters in RFCs https://tools.ietf.org/
> pdf/rfc7997.pdf
>
> I especially like recommendation to allow person names to be written in
> their native scripts. The native script form is placed first and thus
> treated as primary, as it should be IMHO. The romanised/ASCII form is
> placed second and bracketed, and thus treated as secondary, as it should be
> IMHO.
>
> eg from section 3.2
>
> 吴钦 (Q. Wu)
>
> André Schappo
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/attachments/20170205/7e214c3c/attachment.html>