Should U+3248 ... U+324F be wide characters?

Asmus Freytag via Unicode unicode at unicode.org
Wed Aug 16 14:04:51 CDT 2017

Previous message: Should U+3248 ... U+324F be wide characters?
Next message: Should U+3248 ... U+324F be wide characters?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/attachments/20170816/1a586eae/attachment.html>

Previous message: Should U+3248 ... U+324F be wide characters?
Next message: Should U+3248 ... U+324F be wide characters?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Unicode mailing list