Standaridized variation sequences for the Desert alphabet?

[Mark Davis ☕️]

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Michael Everson <everson at evertype.com>
wrote:

> I just get frustrated when everyone including the veterans seems to forget
> every bit of precedent that we have for the useful encoding of characters.
>

​Nobody's forgetting anything. ​Simply because people disagree with you
doesn't mean they are forgetful or stupid. One could just as well respond
that you are forgetting that Unicode is *not* a glyph standard. Merely
because a character have multiple shapes is not grounds for disunifying it.

Mark
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/attachments/20170406/6a2857f8/attachment.html>