Standaridized variation sequences for the Desert alphabet?

Mark Davis ☕️ mark at
Thu Apr 6 10:05:37 CDT 2017

On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Michael Everson <everson at>

> I just get frustrated when everyone including the veterans seems to forget
> every bit of precedent that we have for the useful encoding of characters.

​Nobody's forgetting anything. ​Simply because people disagree with you
doesn't mean they are forgetful or stupid. One could just as well respond
that you are forgetting that Unicode is *not* a glyph standard. Merely
because a character have multiple shapes is not grounds for disunifying it.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the Unicode mailing list