PETSCII mapping?

[James Kass]

Rebecca Bettencourt wrote,

> I can put together a unified chart, with mappings to Unicode where
> they exist. In fact I think I'll do that. :)

I hope you do.  That would be a good starting point.

> I'm all willing to help put together a proposal for encoding missing
> block element characters, but I would need other people to a) gather
> evidence of use in plain text and b) write up the proposal in Unicode's
> formal language since I've never proposed characters to Unicode before.

Even the most prolific of our proposers had to start someplace...

> As time goes on, “not in widespread use” will become a flimsier
> and flimsier argument against inclusion...

Agreed.  As arguments go, that one was never very robust.

Best regards,

James Kass