Noto unified font

Philippe Verdy verdy_p at
Sun Oct 9 06:28:55 CDT 2016

2016-10-09 8:17 GMT+02:00 Luke Dashjr <luke at>:

> On Sunday, October 09, 2016 4:37:24 AM Philippe Verdy wrote:
> > The licence itself says it respects the 4 FSF freedoms. It also
> explicitly
> > allows reselling (rule DFSG #1):
> >
> No, it doesn't. That link is just a commentary, and of no relevance to non-
> SIL-owned fonts.

The link is the one directly used on the Noto description page when it
refers to the OFL licence. It is not saying that it is only for SIL-owned
fonts. Google/Monotype would have linked to another page if needed but this
is the most relevant one explicitly stated by Google on the Noto site.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the Unicode mailing list