The (Klingon) Empire Strikes Back
Mark E. Shoulson
mark at kli.org
Sun Nov 13 15:59:25 CST 2016
On 11/09/2016 11:49 PM, Peter Constable wrote:
> *From:*Unicode [mailto:unicode-bounces at unicode.org] *On Behalf Of
> *Mark E. Shoulson
> *Sent:* Friday, November 4, 2016 1:18 PM
> > At any rate, this isn't Unicode's problem…
> You saying that potential IP issues are not Unicode’s problem does not
> in fact make it not a problem. A statement in writing from authorized
> Paramount representatives stating it would not be a problem for either
> Unicode, its members or implementers of Unicode would make it not a
> problem for Unicode.
That's a fair point; any problems arising from this *would* affect
Unicode. I guess what I was trying to say is that such an issue, while
a problem once encoding proceeds, should not affect the determination of
whether or not the encoding is *warranted*.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Unicode