UAX44: loose matching of symbolic values and the `is` prefix
mathias at qiwi.be
Tue Jun 7 14:13:09 CDT 2016
> On 7 Jun 2016, at 17:56, Doug Ewell <doug at ewellic.org> wrote:
> Rather than changing the spec based on anecdotal evidence, […]
> It seems irresponsible to assume now that nobody anywhere needs
What assumption are you talking about? Markus and Nova provided actual examples of implementations not following the spec, and so far no one has been able to provide even a single counter-example.
> There must have been some basis for including the "is" case in the first
Now *that* sounds like an assumption to me.
More information about the Unicode