Redundancy in TR14

[Karl Williamson]

On 01/11/2016 10:55 PM, Mark Davis ☕️ wrote:
> Looks that way to me too. Can you submit this as feedback?

will do

>
> {phone}
>
> On Jan 12, 2016 00:39, "Karl Williamson" <public at khwilliamson.com
> <mailto:public at khwilliamson.com>> wrote:
>
>     Example 7 in http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr14/#Examples
>
>     has these two rules
>
>     NU × (NU | SY | IS)
>
>     NU (NU | SY | IS)* × (NU | SY | IS | CL | CP )
>
>     It appears to me that the first rule generates a subset of what the
>     2nd rule generates, and so is useless.  It could be hence removed
>     for simplicity, unless I'm missing something or there is a typo and
>     it is meant to generate something else.
>