Re: [UTR#51-8] 2.4 Emoji Implementation Notes
charupdate at orange.fr
Sat Aug 13 02:12:43 CDT 2016
On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 14:09:09 +0200, Christoph Päper wrote:
> 1. If there’s any VS-16 or any character with `Emoji_Presentation=Yes`
> in a ZWJ sequence, the whole sequence SHOULD be treated as emoji(s).
> 2. A ZWJ sequence SHOULD be treated as emoji(s) if it contains only
> characters that either have `Emoji_Presentation=Yes` or whose glyph
> *can* be affected by VS-16.
One fine thing about discussing emoji is that we arenʼt really meant to bother
whether to append a plural s:
[Please, read down until where the Consortium is cited.]
Itʼs all about following the “tsunamis” or the “sushi” pattern. I believe
the latter is more appropriate for emoji, as weʼre at ease acknowledging
their birth country.
More information about the Unicode