Concise term for non-ASCII Unicode characters
daniel.buenzli at erratique.ch
Tue Sep 29 15:59:49 CDT 2015
Le mardi, 29 septembre 2015 à 21:03, Richard Wordingham a écrit :
> Too wordy and clearly prone to error!
Yes and maybe that "average engineer" does not understand negation. So clearly any of non-ASCII, non-Basic Latin or greater than U+007F cannot fit. Bring in the bureaucrats, new terminology is needed, there are not enough useless definitions in the Unicode standard, let's add a few more.
More information about the Unicode