Tag characters

[Peter Constable]

Well, the same reasoning could also argue for the contra-positive (a→b ⊨ ¬b→¬a): that UTC should not consider endorsing such a tag scheme.

Peter

From: William_J_G Overington [mailto:wjgo_10009 at btinternet.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 12:54 AM
To: unicode at unicode.org; Peter Constable; eric.muller at efele.net; asmus-inc at ix.netcom.com
Subject: Re: Tag characters

Peter Constable wrote as follows:

> Would Unicode really want to get into the business of running a UFL service?

Well, Unicode is about precision, interoperability and long-term stability, and, given, in relation to one particular specified base character followed by some tag characters, that a particular sequence of Unicode characters is intended to lead to the display of an image representing a particular flag, it seems to me highly reasonable that the Unicode Technical Committee might seriously consider providing that facility.

William Overington

27 May 2015


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/attachments/20150527/ab56f787/attachment.html>