Flag tags with U+1F3F3 and subtypes

[Markus Scherer]

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Doug Ewell <doug at ewellic.org> wrote:

> Is the new mechanism intended to allow flag tags that include either
> "subtype" values or "contains" values?


As far as I can tell from your quotes, CLDR will say what's valid (plus
containment info), and Unicode permits you to show a flag for any valid tag.
North Lanarkshire seems perfectly fine.

I am curious to see if the redundant hyphen will be part of the syntax.

markus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://unicode.org/pipermail/unicode/attachments/20150518/0728d534/attachment.html>